Security
Knowing who is on site, where and why reduces unauthorised access and helps protect sensitive, restricted areas.
An impartial guide to help you decide what really fits your organisation. We compare the three common approaches — the classic paper sign-in book, an Excel sheet and dedicated visitor management software — with the pros, cons and practical advice for every kind of workplace.
In short
There are three common ways to manage who comes into your workplace: a paper sign-in book at reception, an Excel sheet and dedicated visitor management software on a tablet. None is right or wrong in the abstract: the best choice depends on visitor numbers, the number of sites, your security needs and GDPR compliance.
In a nutshell: paper is cheap but fragile; Excel brings order at low cost but has practical limits; software is the most complete option when confidentiality, traceability and professional image matter.
More and more organisations want a tidy record of who enters their premises — not just visitors, but suppliers, contractors, consultants, drivers and other external staff. The reasons are concrete — security, emergency response, audits, a professional image — and they often clash with makeshift tools: an illegible logbook, an Excel file nobody keeps up to date, a history that vanishes when you need it.
This guide isn’t here to sell you anything: it’s here to help you choose with confidence. We weigh each option fairly, with a full comparison table and a section dedicated to working out which solution best fits your reality — from a small business to a production site.
Before choosing a tool, it’s worth remembering why keeping an entry record is useful. It isn’t red tape: it answers real needs for anyone running a reception, a plant or an office.
Knowing who is on site, where and why reduces unauthorised access and helps protect sensitive, restricted areas.
In an evacuation, an up-to-date list of people present makes the roll call fast and reliable, supporting your health-and-safety duties.
Hosts notified, legible details and no lost sheets: the front-desk flow becomes simpler and far less error-prone.
During inspections, ISO audits or internal reviews, a tidy, searchable access history is immediate proof of traceability.
Visitor details are personal data: they must be collected sensibly, protected and kept only as long as needed. A structured process makes the GDPR easier to meet.
After a theft, damage or dispute you can reconstruct who was present, when and why — evidence that memory can’t provide.
This is the classic approach: a logbook or pre-printed form at reception, where each visitor handwrites their name, company, host and time, often with a signature. It works without any technology and everyone knows how to use it.
On arrival, the guest fills in a line of the book, sometimes helped by reception. The data stays on paper, kept in a binder. Retrieval is manual: to find a past visit, you leaf through the pages.
Pros
Cons
Paper can still do the job in very small settings, with a handful of visits a week, where no sensitive data or particular security requirements are involved. For everything else, it soon shows its limits.
The spreadsheet is the first step towards digital: an Excel file (or Google Sheet) with a column for each field — name, company, host, time in, time out. Many companies build their own or start from a ready-made template.
Reception enters each visit on a new row. Filters and search make it easy to find past entries, and exporting or printing is instant. It’s free if you already have spreadsheet software.
Pros
Cons
Excel is a good fit for small, well-run settings, where one person handles access from a single point and volumes are modest. It’s also the ideal way to work out which data is worth collecting before adopting a more complete tool.
Dedicated software replaces the logbook with an app on a tablet (iPad or Android) at the entrance. The visitor signs in independently, reads the privacy notice and signs on screen; the data lands in a tidy, secure archive.
On arrival, the guest enters their details on the tablet, often in their own language, and signs. The host can get an automatic notification, and the history stays searchable. The most complete tools centralise data across several sites and entrances in a single dashboard.
Pros
Cons
Software pays off when visitors are frequent, when confidentiality and traceability matter, when you handle several entrances or sites, or when you want a professional image right from reception. Many tools offer a free version for a single entrance, usable offline too: a no-cost way to try the digital approach.
A practical summary of the three options across the aspects that really matter when choosing. It’s a general assessment: the details vary with the specific tool and how it’s configured.
| Aspect | Paper | Excel | Software |
|---|---|---|---|
| Upfront cost | Minimal | Minimal | Free to scalable |
| Ease of use | Immediate | Good | High, with a short setup |
| Searching the history | Slow, manual | Reasonable, with filters | Instant and structured |
| Multi-user | No | Limited | Yes, with roles and access |
| Multi-site / multi-entrance | No | Difficult | Yes (cloud versions) |
| GDPR compliance | Weak (confidentiality) | Depends on the file | Easier by design |
| Data security | Low | Medium | High (controlled access) |
| Audit and traceability | Difficult | Manual | Tidy, searchable history |
| Statistics and reports | None | Basic | Advanced (dashboard, CSV) |
| Emergency management | Difficult | Manual | People on site in real time |
| Professional image | Dated | Adequate | Modern and polished |
| Automation (alerts, signature) | None | None | Yes (signature, alerts, QR) |
There’s no one-size-fits-all answer: the right choice depends on context. Here’s practical guidance for the most common profiles. These are general pointers, to adapt to your situation.
A handful of visitors a week, a single point of welcome, no particularly sensitive data.
Recommended a tidy Excel or PDF template; a free digital version if image matters.
Clients who value discretion, a need for confidentiality and a polished welcome.
Recommended digital, even the free version: each client sees only their own details.
A steady flow of visitors and suppliers, several hosts, a need for order and traceability.
Recommended digital: host alerts, searchable history, a professional image.
Suppliers, drivers, maintenance staff and external technicians; safety rules to acknowledge.
Recommended digital with signature and policy acceptance; see our page on factories.
A headquarters or executive office, image front and centre, many guests and meetings.
Recommended digital: a modern, self-service, multilingual welcome with host alerts.
Multiple entrances, multiple sites, frequent audits, a need to consolidate access data.
Recommended cloud software: multi-entrance, multi-site and centralised data in one dashboard.
For industrial settings we go deeper on our page about visitor management for factories and sites, while the free vs advanced version comparison helps you pick the right level of features.
Whatever tool you choose, some mistakes keep coming up. Knowing them helps you build a more solid, compliant process.
Paper and Excel can serve for a long time. There are, however, some practical signs that it’s time to consider software: if two or three ring true for you, the switch would probably save time and trouble.
Reception struggles to keep up and manual entry slows down the welcome.
Data fragments into separate logs that are impossible to consolidate and compare by hand.
You’re often asked for a tidy access history, and rebuilding it from paper or Excel is onerous.
You want to know how many visitors, in which time slots, for which departments — data paper can’t give you.
Drivers, technicians and maintenance staff come and go constantly and you need reliable traceability.
Clients or rules require that one visitor can’t see another’s details: the book no longer cuts it.
If these signs sound familiar, the move can be gradual: many start from a free version for a single entrance and grow towards the cloud version when they need centralisation and reports. You don’t need to lose your history: Excel data can be exported and kept alongside the new system.
IRIGuest is a digital visitor management system built as the natural next step from the logbook and the spreadsheet: it replaces paper with an app on iPad and Android tablets, without making reception’s job harder. It’s designed to make exactly what the GDPR asks for simple — collect only useful data, show the privacy notice, protect confidentiality — and to give a tidy image at the welcome desk.
There’s a free version, usable offline and with no time limit, ideal for a single entrance, and a cloud version for those running several sites who want automatic host notifications, centralised reports and QR-code management. You can start simple and grow when you need to.
Want to see how it works before downloading it? Try it online in seconds, or talk to us to find the right fit for your organisation.
It depends on volumes and needs. A paper book is cheap and needs no technology, but it’s weak on confidentiality (whoever signs sees the previous entries), hard to search and hard to manage over time. A digital log needs a device, but it protects data, makes the history searchable and simplifies GDPR compliance. For a few occasional visits paper may be enough; once visitors grow or security and traceability matter, digital is the more solid choice.
To get started, yes: a spreadsheet brings order, is free and allows basic search and filters. The limits appear with growth: it doesn’t handle the visitor’s signature or the privacy notice at sign-in, it’s easy to overwrite or duplicate, it doesn’t alert hosts and it offers no real access control over the file. It’s a good starting point, not a complete reception solution.
The core difference is confidentiality, security and searchability. On paper, every visitor can read the previous names, the history is hard to consult and selective deletion is almost impossible. A digital system gives each visitor a private sign-in, a searchable archive, controlled access and reports — all of which make GDPR compliance easier.
All three can be run compliantly, but digital starts ahead. Paper exposes one visitor’s data to the next and makes selective deletion hard; Excel depends entirely on how the file is protected; dedicated software allows controlled access, confidentiality between visitors, a privacy notice at sign-in and targeted deletion. See our dedicated page on visitor logs and the GDPR.
If you collect visitor data, GDPR principles apply: keep it only as long as necessary for the purpose (storage limitation), then delete it. The Regulation sets no fixed period; many organisations define a proportionate, documented retention period stated in the privacy notice. Avoid piling up logs indefinitely.
Suppliers, drivers, technicians and maintenance staff should be recorded like other visitors, noting the internal host, the reason and the times in and out. On industrial sites it helps to pair this with acknowledging safety rules or an NDA via signature. Digital software simplifies the flow, keeping a real-time record of who is on site and a history for audits.
It varies a lot with features and the number of sites and entrances. There are free solutions for a single point of welcome, usable offline, and subscription versions that add centralised data, reports, notifications and multi-site management. A good approach is to start with a free version and move to an advanced one only when your needs require it.
Yes. Most digital solutions let you import or keep your existing history alongside, and they export data in Excel-compatible CSV. It’s usually best to keep the old history as an archive and start recording new entries in the software: the transition is gradual and you don’t have to throw away past work.
Not always. Some apps, including free versions, run entirely offline on a tablet — ideal for a single entrance without reliable network. Cloud versions use the internet to centralise data across sites, send host notifications and offer dashboards and reports. The choice depends on how much centralisation you need.
No — a good check-in app is built for guests to use unassisted in a few taps, often in several languages. They enter their details, read the privacy notice and sign on screen. The experience is usually quicker and tidier than handwriting on a paper book.
Only what is useful for the stated purpose, under the minimisation principle: typically full name, company, the person or department visited, and date and time in and out. The reason for the visit and a signature for policy acknowledgement are optional. Taking copies of ID is generally disproportionate and best avoided unless a specific rule requires it.
This is exactly where paper and Excel fall down: with multiple entrances or sites, data fragments into separate logs that are hard to consolidate. A cloud solution centralises every entry in one dashboard, distinguishes entrances and lets you review the whole history across sites. It’s the case where digital makes the biggest difference.
Yes, concretely. In an evacuation you need to know at once who is on site: with paper that means grabbing the book and reading it by hand, with Excel it depends on who kept the file current. A digital log shows the people present in real time, making the roll call fast and reliable in support of safety duties.
Not always: for a few visits a day a tidy Excel or PDF template may be enough. Even so, small organisations benefit from digital when client confidentiality matters (professional firms in particular) or when image counts at the welcome desk. Often the best choice is a free version: no cost, but confidentiality, signature and privacy notice already handled properly.
It depends on how you want to work. A printable PDF suits you if you prefer signing on paper and a physical binder, but it inherits the limits of paper. Excel is better for searching, filtering and keeping a digital history, but it doesn’t handle the signature and privacy notice at sign-in. Our free kit includes both, so you can try them and see which fits your flow.
On paper this is the weakest point: whoever signs reads the names of those before them. Excel depends on who can open the file. A digital log solves it at the root, because each visitor fills in only their own record and never sees anyone else’s. It’s one of the main reasons GDPR-conscious organisations move to digital.
Start free with the IRIGuest app, or try it online in seconds. No commitment, no time limit.